Kelvin Settle v. United States, No. 12-3277 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case - Forfeiture. Dismissal of motion for return of property and motion for sanctions affirmed without comment. [ February 15, 2013
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-3277 ___________________________ Kelvin Settle lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: January 23, 2013 Filed: February 19, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Kelvin Settle appeals the district court s1 dismissal of his motion for return of property and denial of his motion to sanction the government. 1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. See 18 U.S.C. § 983(e)(1) (requirements for granting motion to set aside declaration of forfeiture include that moving party did not know or have reason to know of seizure within sufficient time to file timely claim); 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (false-statement offense and penalties do not apply to party to judicial proceeding). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
