United States v. David Tensley, Jr., No. 12-3216 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal case - Sentencing. Sentence imposed upon the revocation of defendant's supervised release was not substantively unreasonable.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-3216 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. David Jerome Tensley, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport ____________ Submitted: May 24, 2013 Filed: May 31, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. David Tensley directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief questioning the substantive reasonableness of Tensley s revocation sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable revocation sentence. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (discussing standards and procedures for reviewing district court s sentencing decision upon revocation of supervised release). Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel s motion to withdraw. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
