Rhonda Golden v. Dollar General Corporation, No. 12-3027 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case. Dismissal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-3027 ___________________________ Rhonda Golden lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Dollar General Corporation; Michelle Hughes; Tom O Connell, district manager; Ruth Greggory, risk management; Gaylon Keetis, regional manager; Kimberly Knaff; Ray LNU, store manager lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: February 14, 2013 Filed: March 1, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Rhonda Golden appeals the district court s1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of her complaint. After careful de novo review, see Palmer v. Ill. Farmers Ins. Co., 666 F.3d 1081, 1083 (8th Cir. 2012), we conclude that the dismissal was proper because Golden s complaint did not allege sufficient facts to support any of her claims, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, that states facially plausible claim for relief). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
