Gamachu Beyena v. Sunburst Transit, LLC, No. 12-2398 (8th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Employment discrimination. District court's finding that the employment discrimination action was barred by res judicata is affirmed without comment. [ October 26, 2012
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 12-2398 ___________________________ Gamachu Mekonine Beyena, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Sunburst Transit, LLC, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis ____________ Submitted: October 17, 2012 Filed: October 29, 2012 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Gamachu Beyena appeals the decision of the district court,1 dismissing with prejudice his employment-discrimination action against his former employer, 1 The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. Sunburst Transit, LLC. The district court determined that his action was barred by res judicata. After careful de novo review, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
