United States v. Andolini, No. 12-2124 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant pled guilty to one count of mail fraud and two counts of aggravated identity theft. Defendant used stolen identities to obtain housing and public assistance benefits. Before sentencing, he moved to withdraw his plea and the district court denied the motion. The court concluded that defendant's plea was knowing and voluntary and his post-plea claims contradicted his previous testimony. Defendant's complaints did not present a fair and just reason for withdrawing his plea. Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion by rejecting his motion.
Court Description: Criminal case - Criminal law. District court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.