United States v. Sullivan, No. 12-1754 (8th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance analogue. The court concluded that a reasonable juror could find that defendant knew mephedrone was a controlled substance analogue and that defendant intended the mephedrone for human consumption. Accordingly, the court concluded that a reasonable jury could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and affirmed the conviction.
Court Description: Criminal case - Criminal case. Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for possession of a controlled substance analogue with intent to distribute.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.