M.M., et al v. Dist 0001 Lancaster Co. School, No. 11-3774 (8th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CasePlaintiffs alleged that their autistic son was not provided a free appropriate public education (FAPE) by the school district as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. The court affirmed the district court's holding that the school district had provided a FAPE for the child and allowed his parents meaningful participation in the development of his behavior and educational plans.
Court Description: Civil case - Individuals with Disabilities Act. District court did not err in determining that the defendant school district had provided a free and appropriate education for plaintiffs' son; plaintiffs were given a meaningful opportunity to participate in their son's fourth grade individualized education plan.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.