Allstate Property & Casualty v. Reginald Bailey, No. 11-3621 (8th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case. Summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 11-3621 ___________________________ Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Reginald Bailey lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant Roxanna Bailey lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant Franklin Credit Management Corp. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: August 1, 2012 Filed: August 6, 2012 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. In this interpleader action, Reginald Bailey appeals the district court s1 adverse summary judgment decision. Following careful de novo review, see Stein v. Chase Home Fin., LLC, 662 F.3d 976, 979 (8th Cir. 2011) (standard of review), we conclude that the summary judgment decision was appropriate for the reasons stated by the district court. We also conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to impose sanctions, see MHC Inv. Co. v. Racom Corp., 323 F.3d 620, 624 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review), or in denying reconsideration, see Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
