First Bancshares, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co., No. 11-3525 (8th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Insurance. Defendant's summary judgment affirmed without comment. [ July 27, 2012
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-3525 ___________ Division of Employment Security, State of Missouri, Movant, First Bancshares, Inc.; First Home Savings Bank, Appellants, v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, Appellee, Vicky J. Dooms, Third Party Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. [UNPUBLISHED] ___________ Submitted: July 25, 2012 Filed: July 30, 2012 ___________ Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. In this diversity-based action for declaratory judgment related to insurance coverage, First Bancshares, Inc., and its subsidiary, First Home Savings Bank, appeal the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in favor of St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company. Following careful de novo review, see H & R Block, Inc. v. Am. Int l Specialty Lines Ins. Co., 546 F.3d 937, 938 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated by the district court, cf. Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum & Spewak, P.C. v. Bar Plan Mut. Ins. Co., 969 S.W.2d 749, 752-54 (Mo. 1998) (en banc) (former client s malpractice suit against law firm was not covered by law firm s claims-made policy; policy did not cover damages arising from claim against insured who, before policy effective date, knew or reasonably should have known of circumstance, act, or omission that might reasonably be basis of that claim; default decree against former client combined with her letters of complaint provided firm with sufficient basis to believe that it had committed such act or omission); see also Secura Ins. v. Horizon Plumbing, Inc., 670 F.3d 857, 861 (8th Cir. 2012) (state law governs interpretation of insurance policies when federal jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
