United States v. Whispering Oaks Residential, et al., No. 11-3123 (8th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseWhispering Oaks appealed the district court's rulings granting the Government's motion to compel information related to a healthcare fraud investigation. The court affirmed the judgment because the subpoena was issued pursuant to a lawful authority, for a lawful purpose, requesting information relevant to the lawful purpose, and the information sought was not unreasonable. Further, Whispering Oaks had not met its burden of showing that enforcement of the subpoenas at issue would be an abuse of the court's process.
Court Description: Criminal case - subpoenas. Subpoenas issued in investigation of federal health care offenses were issued pursuant to lawful authority, were for a lawful purpose, sought information reasonably relevant to the investigation and were not unreasonable. [ March 09, 2012
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.