Karen M. Seaworth v. William F. Messerli, et al, No. 10-3532 (8th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Consumer law. Defendants' summary judgments on plaintiff's Fair Debt Collections Practices Act suits affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ Nos. 10-3532/10-3533 ___________ Karen M. Seaworth, Appellant, v. William F. Messerli; Ross Kramer; Jaime J. Hommerding, Appellees, * * * * * * * * * * * ___________ No. 10-3534 ___________ Karen M. Seaworth, Appellant, v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.; Ross Kramer; Amanda E. Prtuzman, Appellees, ___________ No. 10-3535 ___________ * * * * * * * * * * * Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. [UNPUBLISHED] Karen M. Seaworth, Appellant, v. William F. Messerli; Ross Kramer; Amanda E. Prutzman, Appellees, * * * * * * * * * * ___________ Submitted: March 7, 2011 Filed: March 15, 2011 ___________ Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, Karen M. Seaworth appeals the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her four separate but related Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lawsuits. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Seaworth s arguments for reversal, see Volden v. Innovative Fin. Sys., Inc., 440 F.3d 947, 950 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review), we find no basis for overturning the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
