Sokhna Kane v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., No. 09-3933 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Petition for Review - Immigration. BIA acted within its discretion in denying petitioner's motion to reopen.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-3933 ___________ Sokhna Kane, Petitioner, v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. * * * * Petition for Review of * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * * ___________ Submitted: August 13, 2010 Filed: August 25, 2010 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Mauritanian citizen Sokhna Kane petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge s denial of her motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion. See Clifton v. Holder, 598 F.3d 486, 490-91 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review); Tamenut v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1000, 1001, 1004-05 (8th Cir. 2008) (en banc) (per curiam) (reopening sua sponte); Ghasemimehr v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1160, 1162 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (untimeliness); Hernandez-Moran v. Gonzales, 408 F.3d 496, 499-500 (8th Cir. 2005) (equitable tolling). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. ______________________________
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
