Adam Strege v. Deutsche Hypotheken Bank, etc., et al, No. 09-3716 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case. Dismissal affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-3716 ___________ Adam Paul Strege, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Deutsche Hypotheken Bank, and its * subsidiaries; Cathy Bowman, and her * Husband and his Underwriting * Company; Cathy Bowman s Daughter, * the Afghanistan Ambassador, Her * Husband the Swiss Banker, the Swiss * Bank he works for; Cathy Bowman s * Son, that deals with Embezzlement in * Washington, D.C.; Cathy Bowman s * Children, Both in their official and * unofficial capacity; Pasco M. Bowman, * In his official and unofficial capacity; * James B. Loken, In his official and * unofficial capacity; Opus Construction * Company; Wilson McShane; William * H. Stephenson; Rob, at 1892 Feronia * Ave.; Judy McCoy, And Husband in * official and unofficial capacity; Brian * Obert, In his official and unofficial * capacity; Homeowner at 452 Laurel * Ave., and her ex-husband in his * official and unofficial capacity; * Sahara McGee, Minnesota Attorney * General in official and unofficial * capacity; West Law, and the company * at 610 Opperman Drive; Gerald * Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. [UNPUBLISHED] Rauenhorst; U.S. Bancorp; U.S. Bank; Landesbank Baden Wuerttemberg; North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters; United States of America, Appellees. * * * * * * * ___________ Submitted: May 17, 2010 Filed: May 20, 2010 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Adam Paul Strege appeals the district court s1 order granting defendants motions to dismiss his complaint. The district court reasoned, in part, that Strege s complaint, which consisted of unintelligible allegations of conspiracy to conceal murder and other wrongdoing on the part of the named individuals and entities, failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted against any defendant. Following careful de novo review, we agree. See Friends of Lake View Sch. Dist. Inc. No. 25 v. Beebe, 578 F.3d 753, 758 (8th Cir. 2009) (court may affirm on any basis record supports); see also Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554-55, 570 (2007) (to survive motion to dismiss for failure to state claim, complaint must contain enough facts to state claim to relief that is plausible on its face); Carter v. Arkansas, 392 F.3d 965, 968 (8th Cir. 2004) (de novo review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
