Hunter Levi v. U.S. Dept of Labor, et al, No. 09-3656 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Petition for Review - Order of the Department of Labor. Administrative Review Board's decision was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, contrary to law or unsupported by substantial evidence in the record.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-3656 ___________ Hunter R. Levi, * * Petitioner, * * v. * * Petition for Review of an United States Department of Labor, * Order of the United States * Department of Labor. Respondent, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. * * Intervenor. * ___________ Submitted: July 29, 2010 Filed: August 3, 2010 ___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Hunter Levi petitions for review of a final order of the United States Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB), affirming the dismissal of his administrative complaint that Anheuser Busch Companies, Inc., violated the whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the ARB s decision is not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, contrary to the law, or unsupported by substantial evidence in the record. See 49 U.S.C. § 42121(b)(4)(A), providing for review of an ARB decision under the Administrative Procedure Act; 5 U.S.C. § 706(2), prescribing the APA standard of review. Levi s contention that the Department of Labor is selectively enforcing the law is without merit. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
