Eric Khounlo v. John Deere Credit, et al, No. 09-3085 (8th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - employment discrimination. Appellant's brief fails to identify any alleged error by the district court and does not provide a relevant statement of issues or facts; as a result, the appeal is dismissed.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-3085 ___________ Eric Khounlo, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. John Deere Credit; R. Steven Brubaker, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: June 4, 2010 Filed: June 9, 2010 ___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Eric Khounlo appeals the district court s1 order dismissing his pro se employment-discrimination action for failure to prosecute. Khounlo s appeal must be dismissed: his brief does not identify any alleged error by the district court or provide a relevant statement of issues or facts, and therefore it presents nothing for our review. See Carter v. Lutheran Med. Ctr., 87 F.3d 1025, 1026 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (dismissing pro se appeal where brief did not present statement of issues or 1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. identify any basis for alleged error). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, and we also deny the pending motion to strike as moot. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
