Anthony Lane v. Michael Astrue, No. 07-3125 (8th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Civil case - Social Security. District court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion for appointment of counsel; the district court's order is affirmed without prejudice to Lane's ability to renew his request, based on changes in his mental status, as his case progress.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-3125 ___________ Anthony P. Lane, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: May 15, 2008 Filed: May 30, 2008 ___________ Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. In this interlocutory appeal, Anthony P. Lane appeals the district court s1 order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We find no abuse of discretion. See Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (there is no statutory or constitutional right to appointed counsel in civil case; discussing factors). However, it appears from documents Lane filed near the time of the August 2007 1 The Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c). order at issue, and from his filings in this court, that his mental status has changed and that he and the district court might now benefit from the appointment of counsel. Accordingly, we affirm but we clarify that the district court s order is without prejudice to Lane s right to renew his request for counsel as the case progresses. See Nelson v. Shuffman, 476 F.3d 635, 636 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). ______________________________ -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.