United States v. Dwight W. Alexander, No. 07-2672 (8th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Criminal case - sentencing. Discretionary refusal to grant a downward departure for overstated criminal history is unreviewable; mandatory minimum applied to defendant's sentence, and the mandatory minimum sentence under section 841(b)(1)(A) is constitutional.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-2672 ___________ United States of America, Appellee, v. Dwight William Alexander, Appellant. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: December 3, 2008 Filed: December 8, 2008 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Dwight Alexander appeals the 120-month sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture containing cocaine base (crack), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). Alexander argues that his criminal history is overstated; that the court should have imposed a lesser sentence; and that the 120-month statutory minimum sentence is unconstitutional because it does not take into consideration the disparity in sentencing for offenses involving powder cocaine and those involving crack. 1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. We reject these arguments. First, the district court s discretionary refusal to depart downward for overstated criminal history is unreviewable. See United States v. Betts, 509 F.3d 441, 446 (8th Cir. 2007). Second, even after Kimbrough v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 558, 564 (2007) (district court may reasonably vary under18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to account for 100-to-1 crack to powder cocaine disparity), the district court could not sentence Alexander below the 120-month statutory minimum, see id. at 57374 (sentencing courts remain bound by statutory minimum sentences); United States v. Jenkins, 537 F.3d 894, 896 (8th Cir. 2008) (even after Kimbrough, district courts are not authorized to sentence below Congressionally mandated statutory minimums). Third, the mandatory minimum sentence under section 841(b)(1)(A) is constitutional. See United States v. Buckley, 525 F.3d 629, 635 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 77 U.S.L.W. 3242 (U.S. Oct. 20, 2008) (No. 08-6427); United States v. Williams, 474 F.3d 1130, 1132 (8th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm the sentence. ______________________________ -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.