Tanya Boyd Harper v. Brookshire Grocery, No. 05-3812 (8th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - Torts. Defendant's summary judgment affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-3812 ___________ Tanya Boyd Harper, Appellant, v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Appellee. * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * * ___________ Submitted: November 8, 2006 Filed: November 14, 2006 ___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Tanya Boyd Harper appeals from the district court s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. In this diversity action, Harper claimed that Brookshire Grocery Company wrongfully discharged her, defamed her, and committed the tort of outrage against her. 1 The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Upon de novo review, see Dennen v. City of Duluth, 350 F.3d 786, 790 (8th Cir. 2003), we find the district court s analysis to be correct, thorough, and well-reasoned. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
