Kent Richard Jones v. John Stuart, No. 05-3613 (8th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - civil rights. Dismissal of Section 1983 complaint affirmed without comment.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-3613 ___________ Kent Richard Jones, Appellant, v. John Stuart, Appellee. * * * * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. * * [UNPUBLISHED] * ___________ Submitted: December 7, 2006 Filed: December 14, 2006 ___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Kent Richard Jones appeals the district court s1 dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude dismissal of the complaint was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now retired.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
