Hartford Life, etc. v. Stanley Henricksen, No. 05-2639 (8th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Civil case - bankruptcy. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel did not abuse its discretion in denying Henricksen's Rule 60(b) motion.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-2639 ___________ In re: Stanley Reid Henricksen, * * Debtor, * * --------------------------------------* * Hartford Life and Accident Insurance * Appeal from the United States Company, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. * Appellee, * [UNPUBLISHED] * v. * * Stanley Reid Henricksen, * * Appellant, * * Nauni Jo Manty, * * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: June 16, 2006 Filed: June 21, 2006 ___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Debtor Stanley Henricksen (Henricksen) appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel s (BAP s) denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We hold the BAP did not abuse its discretion in denying Henricksen s Rule 60(b) motion. See In re Kirwan, 164 F.3d 1175, 1177 (8th Cir. 1999) (standard review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
