United States v. Roger John Parker, No. 05-2421 (8th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Civil case - Forfeiture. Forfeiture order affirmed without comment.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-2421 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the $6,586.05 in United States Currency, * District of Nebraska. * Defendant, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Roger John Parker, * * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: June 2, 2006 Filed: June 13, 2006 ___________ Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Claimant Roger Parker appeals the district court s1 adverse judgment in this civil forfeiture action. After a bench trial, the court found that the government met its burden of proving that the seized currency was substantially connected to drug1 The Honorable Thomas D. Thalken, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c). trafficking activity and that the money was not derived from legitimate sources. Parker s assertion that the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear his case is without merit because he consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. Accepting the district court s factual findings and evidentiary rulings as correct, see Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(1)-(2); Meroney v. Delta Int l Mach. Corp., 18 F.3d 1436, 1437 (8th Cir. 1994); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988), we conclude the district court s judgment was proper, see United States v. $117,920.00, 413 F.3d 826, 829 (8th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.