Miller v. ALLTEL Kentucky Inc, No. 06-6606 (6th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0810n.06 Filed: November 19, 2007 No. 06-6606 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT KATHY MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLTEL KENTUCKY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY Before: DAUGHTREY and COOK, Circuit Judges; and VINSON, District Judge.* PER CURIAM. In this appeal, we are called upon to consider whether the district court properly entered (i) summary judgment against the plaintiff on her claim of sexually hostile work environment, and (ii) a Rule 50(a) judgment as a matter of law against the plaintiff on her claim of retaliation. Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having studied the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendant. Because the reasons why judgment should be entered for the defendant have been fully articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed opinion by this court would be duplicative and would serve no useful purpose. * The Honorable C. Roger Vinson, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation. No. 06-6606 Miller v. Alltel Kentucky, Inc. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning set out by that court in its opinions and orders dated August 24, 2006, and November 28, 2006. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
