Bonner v. Pearcy, No. 22-40757 (5th Cir. 2023)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 22-40757 Document: 00516658254 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/27/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-40757 ____________ February 27, 2023 FILED Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Ryan Rydell Bonner, also known as Pookie, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus Brian A. Pearcy, Law Enforcement, City of Galveston Police Department; J. Melancon, Law Enforcement, City of Galveston Police Department; Jack Roady, Galveston County Criminal District Attorney; C. D. Simmons, Supervisor, City of Galveston Police Department, Defendants—Appellees. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:19-CV-274 ______________________________ Before Haynes, Oldham, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The district court dismissed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint filed by Ryan Rydell Bonner, Texas prisoner # 2359198. Bonner subsequently filed a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion challenging this ruling, which the district court denied after determining that Rule 60(b) was not a proper _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-40757 Document: 00516658254 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/27/2023 No. 22-40757 vehicle for raising arguments that could have been presented earlier or for generally disagreeing with the district court’s original ruling. Bonner has now filed a motion for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the denial of his postjudgment motion. By moving this court to proceed IFP, he is challenging the district court’s certification that any appeal would not be taken in good faith because Bonner will not present a nonfrivolous appellate issue. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Before this court, Bonner argues that denying him IFP status would constitute a denial of due process. He is incorrect in his assertion. See Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 821-22 (5th Cir. 1997). In addition, Bonner challenges the district court’s original ruling that he failed to state a valid claim for a false arrest. Although he asserts conclusionally that his postjudgment motion was based on mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, and fraud, he makes no meaningful arguments in support of such contentions. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993) (stating that pro se litigants must brief arguments to preserve them). As Bonner has identified no error in the district court’s reasons for denying his Rule 60(b) motion, he has abandoned any challenge to that decision. See Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). The appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). His motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal as frivolous of this appeal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996), abrogated in part on other grounds by Coleman v. Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532, 537 (2015). In addition, the district court’s dismissal of his original complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted also counts as a 2 Case: 22-40757 Document: 00516658254 Page: 3 Date Filed: 02/27/2023 No. 22-40757 strike. See § 1915(g); Adepegba, 103 F.3d at 388. Bonner is WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he will no longer be allowed to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.