Timms v. Douthit, No. 20-10732 (5th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 20-10732 Document: 00516533895 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 20-10732 Summary Calendar FILED November 4, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Paul D. Timms, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus Christian Douthit, Medical Doctor, Defendant—Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:20-CV-67 Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Paul D. Timms, Texas prisoner # 1564883, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding. We review the district court’s denial of IFP status for an abuse of discretion. See Flowers v. Turbine Support Div., 507 F.2d 1242, 1244 * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-10732 Document: 00516533895 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2022 No. 20-10732 (5th Cir. 1975), superseded on other grounds by statute as recognized in Thompson v. Drewry, 138 F.3d 984, 985-86 (5th Cir. 1998). The district court’s determination that Timms was financially ineligible to proceed IFP was not based on arbitrary or erroneous grounds. See Flowers, 507 F.2d at 1244. Given the deposits and balances in Timms’s inmate trust account during the months preceding the initiation of his § 1983 action, the district court’s ruling does not represent an abuse of discretion. See id. AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
