Renfroe v. Parker, No. 19-60677 (5th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
After Michael Renfroe was shot to death by a sheriff's deputy, Mrs. Renfroe filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 claim for excessive force, as well as several state law claims. The deputy was responding to a 911 call from an individual who reported an attempted robbery when the officer encountered the Renfroes.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of qualified immunity to defendants, rejecting Mrs. Renfroe's claim that the qualified immunity doctrine violates the separation of powers and is therefore unconstitutional and void. The court also rejected Mrs. Renfroe's challenge to the district court's exclusion of an expert report because it addressed an issue of law and did not create an issue of fact as to what occurred on the night of the shooting. The court also held that, given Mrs. Renfroe's failure to offer competent summary judgment evidence, her claims challenging the district court's grant of summary judgment are without merit. In this case, despite being present, Mrs. Renfroe did not submit an affidavit describing what she saw as the shooting unfolded. Furthermore, the allegations in her complaint are insufficient. Finally, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mrs. Renfroe's discovery motion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.