Richardson v. Belote, et al, No. 19-40282 (5th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 19-40282 Document: 00515771591 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-40282 Summary Calendar March 9, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Brandon Richardson, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus Brandon Belote; William Stephens; Eileen Kennedy; Gary Currie; Carole Monroe; Thaddeus Hunt; Saqued Salinas; Juan Trevino; Alberto Valdez; Dovie Bunch; Lannette Linthicum; Refugia Campos; Sonia Moron; Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Defendants—Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:14-CV-464 Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 19-40282 Document: 00515771591 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2021 No. 19-40282 Brandon Richardson, Texas prisoner # 740705, has appealed the judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint following a jury trial. Richardson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s rejection of his claims that the defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical condition and used excessive force against him during a use-of-force incident. He also challenges the district court’s evidentiary rulings, and he asserts that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance. As the appellant, Richardson is responsible for supporting his appellate issues with pertinent transcripts of proceedings in the district court, and he has failed to do so. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(1)(A), (2); Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 415-16 (5th Cir. 1990). Richardson’s unsupported appellate issues are subject to dismissal. See Richardson, 902 F.2d at 416. The asserted errors by counsel do not present an appealable issue in this civil case. See Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986). The appeal is DISMISSED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.