USA v. Francisco Saucedo-Vasquez, No. 18-50314 (5th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 18-50308 Document: 00514819348 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/01/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-50308 Conference Calendar FILED February 1, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO JAVIER SAUCEDO-VASQUEZ, also known as Raul Pena Banda, also known as Raul Pena-Banda, also known as Francisco Javier Vasquez-Saucedo, also known as Francisco Saucedo-Vasquez, also known as Javier Francisco, also known as Javier Saucedo Vasuez, also known as Francisco Javier Sauceda, also known as Javier V. Saucedo, also known as Francisco Javier Vasquez, also known as Francisco J. Saucedo, also known as Francisco Javier Saucedo, Defendant-Appellant _______________________ Consolidated with No. 18-50314 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO SAUCEDO-VASQUEZ, also known as Francisco Javier SaucedoVasquez, Defendant-Appellant Case: 18-50308 Document: 00514819348 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/01/2019 No. 18-50308 c/w No. 18-50314 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:18-CR-27-1 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Javier Saucedo-Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Saucedo-Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the records reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
