Marcus Barroso, et al v. State of Texas, et al, No. 16-51096 (5th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 16-51096 Document: 00513908275 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-51096 Summary Calendar FILED March 13, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk MARCUS E. BARROSO; TWELVE JOHN DOES; TWELVE JAY DOES; TWELVE JOE DOES; TWELVE JEFF DOES, Plaintiffs - Appellants v. SHERIFF OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS; BRYAN COLLIER, TDCJ, Executive Director; BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:14-CV-421 Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has carefully reviewed this appeal in light of the briefs, pertinent portions of the record, and the comprehensive district court orders. There is no justification for prolonging this litigation. As this court has ordered before, plaintiffs did not timely appeal the district court’s grant of summary Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-51096 Document: 00513908275 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/13/2017 No. 16-51096 judgment. Their appeal is instead confined to the district court’s August 18, 2016 order. We conclude that the Appellant’s arguments are meritless, as the carefully written orders of the district courts patiently explain. We find no reversible error of law or fact and affirm the district court’s August 18, 2016 order for essentially the same reasons articulated by that order. AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
