USA v. Jaime Estrada-Monzon, No. 16-40544 (5th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 16-40544 Document: 00513813366 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/27/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-40544 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 27, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAIME LUIS ESTRADA-MONZON, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:14-CR-1015-1 Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jaime Luis Estrada-Monzon in the appeal of his revocation sentence has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Estrada-Monzon has filed a response and has moved for appointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-40544 Document: 00513813366 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/27/2016 No. 16-40544 as Estrada-Monzon’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Estrada-Monzon’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
