USA v. Alexander Cobos, No. 16-11059 (5th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 16-11059 Document: 00514045276 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 16-11059 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. ALEXANDER COBOS, also known as Moe, Defendant–Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15-CR-129-10 Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Alexander Cobos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cobos has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Cobos’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 16-11059 Document: 00514045276 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2017 No. 16-11059 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Cobos’s motion to file a pro se brief is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.