USA v. Steven Donoso, No. 13-51181 (5th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 13-51181 Document: 00512828712 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/06/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-51181 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 6, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. STEVEN DONOSO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:08-CR-67-1 Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Steven Donoso has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Donoso has not filed a response. During the pendency of this appeal, Donoso completed the 10-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 13-51181 Document: 00512828712 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/06/2014 No. 13-51181 custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); United States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.