United States v. Gerezano-Rosales, No. 11-50185 (5th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his non-Guidelines sentence of 108-months of imprisonment for illegal reentry. The court held that the district court did not lack jurisdiction to impose the 108-month sentence. The court held, however, that given the entire sentencing hearing, particularly the district court's implicit threat to raise defendant's sentence if he questioned the non-Guidelines sentence, the court concluded that the 108-month, non-Guidelines sentence was substantively unreasonable because it constituted a clear error in judgment in balancing the sentencing factors under the totality of the circumstances. Accordingly, the court vacated and remanded the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.