Daljit Jandu v. USA, et al, No. 11-50156 (5th Cir. 2011)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 11-50156 Document: 00511495162 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit _____________________ FILED No. 11-50156 Summary Calendar _____________________ June 1, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk DALJIT S. JANDU, Plaintiff - Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY; PRESIDENT MTSU JAMES E. WILLIAMS, President of Middle Tennessee State University; DORRIS MIESSNER, Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendants - Appellees __________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CV-660 __________________________ Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that the opposed motion of appellee, Middle Tennessee State University, to be dismissed from this appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-50156 Document: 00511495162 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2011 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the alternative motion of appellee, Middle Tennessee State University, to extend time for thirty (30) days after the court s denial on motion to dismiss appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of appellee, USA, for summary affirmance is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the alternative motion to extend time to file brief for thirty (30) days after the court s denial on motion for summary affirmance is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Judgment affirmed as to Appellees United States of America and Dorris Miessner, appeal dismissed as to remaining Appellees. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.