USA v. Eddie Olmo, No. 11-40635 (5th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 11-40635 Document: 00511699536 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-40635 c/w No. 11-40636 Conference Calendar December 19, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EDDIE OLMOS, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CR-107-8 USDC No. 1:10-CR-98-1 Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Eddie Olmos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Olmos has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Olmos s response. We concur with * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-40635 Document: 00511699536 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2011 No. 11-40635 c/w No. 11-40636 counsel s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Olmos s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.