USA v. Mateo Gonzalez, No. 10-40565 (5th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 10-40564 c/w No. 10-40565 c/w No. 10-40603 Conference Calendar June 21, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MATEO JAIME GONZALEZ, also known as Mateo Gonzalez Jaimes, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10-CR-1035-1 USDC No. 5:10-CR-135-1 USDC No. 5:10-CR-903-1 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and STEWART and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mateo Jaime Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez has filed a response. We have reviewed * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 10-40564 c/w No. 10-40565 c/w No. 10-40603 counsel s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez s response. We concur with counsel s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Gonzalez s motion for authorization to proceed pro se on appeal is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
