Kelly Langley, et al v. Chase Bank USA, NA, No. 10-10876 (5th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 10-10876 Document: 00511516886 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2011 No. 10-10876 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk KELLY B. LANGLEY; CLASSIC CLIPS, L.C., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CHASE BANK USA NA, Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dist. Ct. No. 3:10-CV-587 Before JOLLY and HAYNES, Circuit Judges, and VANCE * , District Judge. PER CURIAM:** Kelly Langley and his company, Classic Clips, individually, and on behalf of a putative class, sued Chase Bank for alleged breaches of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing under Delaware law arising out of a business loan transaction. The district court granted Chase Bank s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, reasoning that the facts stated in the complaint, taken as true, did not state a claim for breach of that duty. Having reviewed and * ** Chief Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 10-10876 Document: 00511516886 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2011 No. 10-10876 considered the pertinent portions of the record, the parties briefing, and their oral arguments in light of Delaware law, we conclude that the district court made no error warranting reversal. Nemec v. Shrader, 991 A.2d 1120 (Del. 2010). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.