USA v. Grimaldo, No. 09-40103 (5th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 09-40103 Document: 00511283150 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/03/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 09-40103 Summary Calendar November 3, 2010 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. THOMAS ARTHUR GRIMALDO, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CR-12-1 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Proceeding pro se, Thomas Arthur Grimaldo, federal prisoner # 44990-079, appeals the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction based on the crack-cocaine amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines. Section 3582 provides a district court discretion to reduce a term of imprisonment if, inter alia, the sentencing range . . . has subsequently been lowered by amendment to the Guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 09-40103 Document: 00511283150 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/03/2010 No. 09-40103 A district court s decision on whether to reduce a sentence is reviewed for abuse of discretion; its interpretation of the Guidelines, de novo. United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3462 (2010). Eligibility for a § 3582 reduction is triggered only by an amendment . . . that lowers the applicable guideline range . U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, cmt. n.1A; see United States v. Gonzalez-Balderas, 105 F.3d 981, 982 (5th Cir. 1997). Due to the amount of crack-cocaine involved in Grimaldo s offense, his offense level was not reduced by the crack-cocaine amendments. Therefore, he is not eligible for a sentence reduction under § 3582. See § 1B1.10, cmt. n.1A; Gonzalez-Balderas, 105 F.3d at 984. Grimaldo contends: the amended crack-cocaine Guideline conflicts with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and impermissibly precludes the district court from considering the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors in reducing his sentence below the Guidelines range of imprisonment; Booker prohibits a mandatory application of the Guidelines; and an analysis of several § 3553(a) factors, including his history, characteristics, and the nature and circumstances of the offense, warrant a lower sentence. Booker does not apply to a § 3582(c)(2) proceeding. Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2691-94 (2010); United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 238-39 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 130 S. Ct. 517 (2009). Accordingly, a § 3582 movant is entitled, at most, to the reduction allowed by the amended Guidelines range; a sentencing court lacks discretion to reduce the sentence any further than allowed by the amendments. Doublin, 572 F.3d at 238. Because Grimaldo is not entitled to a sentence reduction based on the crack-cocaine amendments, no relief is available under § 3582. See Id. AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
