USA v. Raymond Hawthorne, Jr., No. 09-30265 (5th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 09-30265 Summary Calendar January 4, 2010 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAYMOND JOSEPH HAWTHORNE, JR., also known as Tweet, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:99-CR-60043-2 Before BENAVIDES, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Raymond Joseph Hawthorne, Jr., federal prisoner # 330242, was sentenced to 235 months in prison following his plea of guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine base (crack). Following amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that lowered the offense levels for crack cocaine offenses, the district court granted a motion by Hawthorne pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and reduced his sentence to 188 months of imprisonment. Hawthorne now appeals, challenging the limits on the district court s discretion set forth in U.S.S.G. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. No. 09-30265 § 1B1.10 and arguing that the district court had the authority to impose an even lower sentence. Hawthorne s arguments are foreclosed in light of our recent decision in United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 236-39 (5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 21, 2009) (No. 09-6657). Hawthorne also argues that his § 3582 motion for a reduction of sentence required a hearing with him present. Because the district court merely modifie[d] an existing sentence rather than impose a new sentence after the original sentence had been set aside, Hawthorne was not entitled to a hearing. See United States v. Patterson, 42 F.3d 246, 248-49 (5th Cir. 1994); F ED. R. C RIM. P. 43. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.