USA v. Calderon-Terrazas, No. 08-40273 (5th Cir. 2008)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 08-40273 Summary Calendar December 17, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. OSWALDO CALDERON-TERRAZAS Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:07-CR-635-ALL Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Oswaldo Calderon-Terrazas pleaded guilty to unlawful reentry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326. He was sentenced to a withinGuidelines sentence of 51 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Calderon-Terrazas maintains that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court did not provide adequate reasons to support the sentence it imposed. Calderon-Terrazas has moved to seal appellee s brief, and the Government does not oppose the motion. The motion is granted. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-40273 Because Calderon-Terrazas did not object that his sentence was procedurally unreasonable in the district court, review is for plain error. United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir. 2008), petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2008); United States v. Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 2959 (2008). [W]hen a judge decides simply to apply the Guidelines to a particular case, doing so will not necessarily require lengthy explanation . Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2468 (2007). In Rita, the Court acknowledged the district court judge might have said more than that the range was not inappropriate and that a sentence at the bottom of the range was appropriate , but held that the law did not require the district court to do so. Id. at 2469. In United States v. Rodriguez, 523 F.3d 519 (5th Cir.), petition for cert. filed (June 30, 2008) (No. 08-5101), we found sufficient, where the record showed consideration of the Guidelines and the parties arguments, a district court s statement that a sentence at the top of the guidelines range address[ed] the objectives of punishment and deterrence. Id. at 525. In the instant matter, Calderon-Terrazas sought a sentence at the low end of the guidelines range. He stated at the sentencing hearing that he had come to the United States as an infant, graduated from high school in the United States, and served in the United States Army. The district court rejected Calderon-Terrazas s request for leniency, adopted the PSR s findings and recommendation, and imposed a sentence at the top of the guidelines range. At the sentencing hearing, the district court referenced Calderon-Terrazas s criminal history and his character and evidenced a concern about the appropriate sentence given those factors and the need to protect the public. Calderon-Terrazas has not shown the explanation given by the district court was clear or obvious error that affected his substantial rights. See Peltier, 505 F.3d at 392. He has, therefore, not demonstrated plain error. See id. at 394. AFFIRMED; MOTION TO SEAL APPELLEE S BRIEF GRANTED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
