King v. Livingston, et al, No. 05-41466 (5th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 05-41466 Summary Calendar FILED December 11, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk GERALD KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BRAD LIVINGSTON, Executive Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice; ED OWENS, Assistant Executive Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice; NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division; MARGO GREEN, Region III Director; J.P. GUYTON, Assistant Region III Director; CHRISTINA CRAIN, Chairman, Texas Board of Criminal Justice; CURTIS MCKNIGHT, Ramsey I Unit, Head Warden; KELVIN SCOTT, Ramsey I Unit, Assistant Warden; ERNESTO RODRIGUEZ, Lieutenant; VALERIE POWELL, Correctional Officer; MICHAEL KITCHEN, Region III Disciplinary Captain; PATRICIA WEAVER, Counsel Region III; KELLY GUIDRY, JR., Major; AQUISHA GUIDRY, Correctional Officer III; MELVERICK PLAYER, Correctional Officer III; V. STACY HECHT, Correctional Officer Ramsey I Unit Property Officer; ANGELA PERRY, Lieutenant; ELEANOR NOLAN, LVN; CHERYLL HENDRICKS, LVN; TRACY JOHNSON PCA; RONNIE HILL, Correctional Officer IV; CHIRMIRA AUGHT JONES, PCA; SUSIE CHILES, Mail System Coordinator Panel; KENNETH O. NEGBENEBOR, Head Warden, Ramsey II Unit; SAMUEL D. SEALE, IV, Assistant Warden, Ramsey II Unit; SHARON S. MOATES, Mailroom Supervisor; MARION LYNN SMITH, Mailroom Supervisor; ELIZABETH MURPHY, Mail Clerk, Ramsey I Unit; LAURA WHITE, Mail Clerk, Ramsey II Unit; MARIA C. HERNANDEZ, Mail Clerk, Ramsey II Unit; SANDRA SMOCK, FNP, Ramsey II Unit; TODD BOUTON, PA, Ramsey II Unit; KEVIN HANNA, Health Administrator, Defendants-Appellees. -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CV-464 -------------------- O R D E R No. 05-41466 -2Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gerald King, Texas prisoner # 589458, has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal following the district court s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). For the first time on appeal, King alleges that he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury because the defendants failed to evacuate him during Hurricane Rita and because the defendants attempted to induce his death medically. King may not raise new allegations or legal theories for the first time on appeal. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co., 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). King argues that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury because he has been assaulted several times by the defendants and other inmates and because the defendants have attempted to cause him serious physical injury from the time of Hurricane Rita to the present. King fails to meet the showing required to avoid application of the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Banos v. O Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884-85 (5th Cir. 1998). * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. O R D E R No. 05-41466 -3IT IS ORDERED that King s IFP motion is DENIED. Because the district court properly applied 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), King s appeal is without merit and is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
