Dana Wilcox v. Rae Davis, No. 23-1994 (4th Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1994 DANA V. WILCOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HONORABLE RAE OLIVER DAVIS, Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Dept. of H.U.D.; ALANNA MCCARGO, President, Ginnie Mae; STEWART M. SPETTEL, Director, Office of Security Operations; JULIA BRAITHWAITE, Chief Compliance Officer, Bank of New York Mellon; JACQUELINE JOYSTONBECHAL, Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer, Bank of New York Mellon; ANTHONY R. MANCUSO, Vice President, Bank of New York Mellon, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01240-PTG-JFA) Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 26, 2024 Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dana V. Wilcox, Appellant Pro Se. Yuri S. Fuchs, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; Kathryn Margaret Barber, Juliet B. Clark, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dana V. Wilcox appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss Wilcox’s claims alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a to 77aa; the Securities Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a to 78rr; and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 to 1968. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Wilcox v. Davis, No. 1:22-cv-01240-PTG-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 28, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.