Fred Freeman v. Director Stirling, No. 21-6880 (4th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-6880 FRED FREEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR STIRLING; DEPUTY DIRECTOR MCCALL; WARDEN DAVIS; ASSOCIATE WARDEN ANDREA THOMPSON; OPERATION COORDINATOR JOHN OR JANE DOE; EMETTU LILLIAN, P.R.N.; WANDA SERMONS; MEDICAL DIRECTOR JOHN OR JANE DOE; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (9:19-cv-02062-JD) Submitted: January 21, 2022 Decided: February 1, 2022 Before NIEMEYER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Fred Freeman appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying relief on Freeman’s complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and denying Freeman’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.