US v. Maximillian Farrow, No. 20-6616 (4th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6616 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MAXIMILLIAN ROBBINS FARROW, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:17-cr-00120-LMB-1) Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 25, 2020 Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maximillian Robbins Farrow, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Following his guilty plea, Maximillian Robbins Farrow was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. At Farrow’s September 2017 sentencing, the district court imposed a 48-month term of imprisonment. Farrow did not appeal the criminal judgment. Instead, in April 2019, Farrow filed a self-styled motion for clarification of the manner in which the court applied the Sentencing Guidelines in his case. The district court denied this motion on various grounds, and Farrow now appeals that order. Upon review, we discern no error in the district court’s rationale for denying Farrow’s motion for clarification. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Farrow, No. 1:17-cr-00120-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
