Jermaine Tart v. Jamese Vigus, No. 20-6397 (4th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6397 JERMAINE ANTWAN TART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMESE VIGUS; MARK TROCK, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHN DOES; TABOR CITY MAILROOM STAFF, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03207-D) Submitted: August 21, 2020 Decided: September 2, 2020 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jermaine Antwan Tart, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jermaine Antwan Tart appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tart v. Vigus, No. 5:17ct-03207-D (E.D.N.C. May 29, 2018, & Mar. 2, 2020). We grant Tart’s motion to supplement his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.