Melvin Dinkins v. Region Ten CSB, No. 20-1274 (4th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1274 MELVIN DINKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REGION TEN CSB, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cv-00030-NKM) Submitted: August 20, 2020 Decided: August 24, 2020 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Dinkins, Appellant Pro Se. James Morton Bowling, ST. JOHN, BOWLING & LAWRENCE, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Melvin Dinkins appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and denying his postjudgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dinkins v. Region Ten CSB, No. 3:19-cv-00030-NKM (W.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2020 & March 5, 2020). We deny Dinkins’ motion to expedite, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.