Rudis Chicas-Sanchez v. William Barr, No. 19-1688 (4th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1688 RUDIS ONAN CHICAS-SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: January 2, 2020 Decided: January 14, 2020 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christina A. Wilkes, WILKES LEGAL, LLC, Takoma Park, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director, David J. Schor, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rudis Onan Chicas-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion for reconsideration and reopening. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Urbina v. Holder, 745 F.3d 736, 741 (4th Cir. 2014) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.