Katherine Dauphin v. Beverly Hennager, No. 18-1858 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1858 KATHERINE R. DAUPHIN, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BEVERLY L. HENNAGER, Defendant - Appellant, and LOUIS A. JENNINGS, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00149-LO-TCB) Submitted: November 7, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018 Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Beverly L. Hennager, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Beverly L. Hennager appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to validate an attorney’s charging lien filed by Hennager’s former law firm, Troutman Sanders LLP. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Troutman Sanders’ motion to intervene and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dauphin v. Hennager, No. 1:15-cv00149-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. June 15, 2018). We deny Hennager’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.