Thomas Firriolo v. Share Sunbelt Resources, No. 18-1576 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1576 THOMAS RAYMOND FIRRIOLO. Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SHARE SUNBELT RESOURCES, INC., Directors, Employee, Supervisor; MARK GOLDEN, Owner, Palmetto Heating & Air, LLC; JOHN HORN, Manager, Palmetto Heating & Air, Manager & Director of Installation; TRACY CAMPBELL, Office Manager, Palmetto Heating & Air; TIMOTHY COGGINS, Mechanical Inspector for the City of Greenville, formerly Palmetto Heating & Air and previous Director; ALLEN BRISTOW, General Contractor, hired by Share Sunbelt Resources, Inc.; ROSS L. BOWEN, JR., Coordinator for Allen Bristow and Examiner; TRANE CORPORATE SERVICE COMPANY; DIRECTORS, hired Mark Golden, LLC, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Paige Jones Gossett, Magistrate Judge. (6:18-cv-00335-AMQ) Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 3, 2018 Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Raymond Firriolo, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Raymond Firriolo seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in his civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The magistrate judge’s recommendation that Firriolo seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.