Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry, No. 17-7023 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7023 CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FRANK L. PERRY; BEVERLY STUBBS, R.N.; DR. ARTHUR DAVIS; CLINTON BROCKINGTON; DR. SAMI HUSSAN; JANE WELCH; DR. DONALD MICKLOS; LYNDA PADGETT; LITITIA OWENS; LEQUECIA FALCON; PAULA Y. SMITH; MS. CARMEN S. HENDRICKS; DR. KEYSER; PETER WOGLAM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01434-LCB-JEP) Submitted: December 21, 2017 Decided: December 28, 2017 Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Tunstall’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tunstall v. Perry, No. 1:16-cv-01434-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. July 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.