US v. Victor Perkins, No. 17-6836 (4th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6836 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, v. VICTOR PERKINS, Respondent - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:92-hc-00654-BR) Submitted: October 19, 2017 Decided: October 24, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jennifer Dee Dannels, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Victor Perkins appeals from the district court’s order denying his pro se motion to vacate the November 6, 1992, order committing him to the custody and care of the Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Perkins, No. 5:92-hc-00654-BR (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2017). We also deny Perkins’ motions for summary disposition, to appoint counsel, for default judgment, and for bail. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.